Jay-Z And Gats-B

The Great American Novel, not just any novel, made into a film more times than you can shake a stick at. All the directors share the common goal of representing a piece literary brilliance that is in the international cannon on the big screen. A film that could well be called the holy book of novelists. It is The Great Gatsby.

Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire) is a young man who once had dreams of being a writer but fell into the money filled land of Wall Street - hard life for some. He moves from Chicago to New York's fictional West Egg, next door to a mansion that is home to the elusive and mysterious Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio). He also has a cousin living in East Egg, Daisy (Carey Mulligan), married to sports star Tom Buchanan (Joel Edgerton), who introduce him to the land of New York through their friend Jordan (Elizabeth Debicki), parties, and trips to the valley of ashes, where Tom's mistress, Myrtle (Isla Fisher), and her husband, George (Jason Clarke), live. Eventually Nick meets Gatsby at one of his infamously huge parties after hearing many rumours about him. Soon Nick befriends his neighbour and discovers Gatsby's romantic past with his cousin. This begins to create a conflict in simple ol' Nick and the world around him transforms into a dream like reality; but whether it is a nightmare about to happen or not is yet to be seen.

The gardeners at the Buchanans' tend to be referred to as field agents.

Let us kick things of with the wonderful performance given, of course, by the actor constantly in the Academy's blind spot, Leonardo DiCaprio. As Gatsby, DiCaprio is always going to be pinned as the 'main' character due to the title, but in terms of performance, that is just what he is. His full range is shown in Gatsby from charming and full of life, to heartbroken, empty, or furious. Gatsby is soul that keeps everything disguised by huge parties and false lives and DiCaprio absorbs the character, showing his knowledge of the role. Unfortunately, he is the single bright light shining across the bay. A slightly smaller light is Edgerton, who portrays Tom well, understanding his rough but calm nature, and managing to juxtapose that with the more emotional moments in the latter half of the film. The rest of the cast are all 'almost there'. Admittedly, Jordan and Myrtle, two important characters, are hardly given the time of day by Luhrmann, leaving Debicki and Fisher little to work with. Maguire does seem to grasp some form of Nick's character, but only one aspect: confusion at everything. The world Nick is introduced to is indeed strange and new, but only at the very end does Nick seem anywhere near aware of what is going on around him. There are many close ups of his bemusement. Mulligan, a wonderful actress, simply does not command the space in the way it feels Daisy should do. At the start she is a flirty young woman, drawing any male in with a look of her eye, but as the film progresses, she just becomes an addition to Tom or Gatsby's arm. Given little chance to talk above a murmur and very static in many scenes. Of course, the finger of blame could be pointed mostly at Luhrmann, but he already has a lot to answer for.

Green Screen? What green screen?

Why would Baz Luhrmann, director of Moulin Rouge and Romeo and Juliet, possible have to answer for anything? There is no issue with the film almost physically dripping in his unique style, though the editing at times can be distracting. No, the problems are most other things, primarily, the need to highlight anything and everything. Through Nick's constant narrating, the audience are informed (sometimes several times) of the actions that are happening or have just happened on screen. 'I went to Gatsby's' says Nick whilst walking to Gatsby's. But not just narration. Those of you who are familiar with the novel will surely know how symbolic it is. For example, the large billboard depicting the eyes of Dr. TJ Eckleburg, many literary analysts will tell you, symbolise the eyes of God watching the actions. They are always there. But now, imagine Baz Luhrmann sitting next to you, prodding you, shouting, 'SEE THAT BILLBOARD? THAT REPRESENTS GOD! DID YOU SEE WHAT I DID THERE?' There are many other examples but what the biggest fault of the film is, is assuming that all the viewers are imbeciles incapable of deciphering the action or meaning of what is being presented on screen. Whilst visually engaging, the way in which everything is presented just feels off. Take the soundtrack. Sometimes, the gentle covers of hip hop songs fit nicely into the 1920's but then a car passes by, champagne flowing (product placement galore), and seemingly is blasting out Jay Z. The music often does not fit. Sometimes it does. Hit or miss.

Visually captivating and, at times, emotionally consuming. DiCaprio holds the whole film up, and his chemistry with the other characters on screen makes everything that little bit better. A fun filled two hours but also a bit like a party that ends a bit early. Things are a bit mad, but because of that you missed all the exciting stuff and when it is revealed, the party is over, and you no longer care. An unsatisfactory film that will disappoint fans of the book but will no doubt entertain the less pedantic members of the world.

Best Bit? The big conflict between Tom, Daisy, and Gatsby, when they are isolated and alone. The editing slows down, the tension rises, the climax is fully engaging and enjoyable. The Hotel Plaza is clearly the place to be.

 I saw this with my good buddy Jack. Naturally, we dressed for the occasion. 

Don't Worry, Death Is Funny.

Yesterday I went to see Scott Pilgrim (for the third time) and also Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis' new film, Burke and Hare. Burke and Hare, for those of you who don't know, were a real pair of murderers from the 1800s. In fact, Hare has been referred to as 'one of the worst villains to ever draw breath.' But have no fear, this is a comedy. One of the darkest comedies for a while... You feel bad for laughing at it.

The movie follows the story of the two Irish immigrants in their attempt to get work and money in 19th century Scotland. Trying to make ends meet as con artists and through Hare's (Serkis) lodging house which he runs with his wife, Lucky (Jessica Hynes,) the pair discover stumble across a way to get rich quick. The two top medical science practices in the world need dead bodies (or cadavers, if you will) but Dr. Knox (Tom Wilkinson) can't get his hands on any due to a new by law saying that Dr. Monroe (Tim Curry) gets all of the recently executed. He becomes willing to pay a fair amount of money for any cadavers delivered to him. Cue Burke and Hare's new job. After one of Hare's lodgers passes away, the duo stumble across Knox's payments and after a very brief (and unsuccessful) attempt as grave robbers, they go into business as murderers. Hare: for enough money to live and set up a real business. Burke: for enough money to fund an all female production of Macbeth and impress Ginny (Isla Fisher.)

The duo looked sad. Turned out their business was dead.

The history isn't perfect but it's well covered by a brief message at the beginning, informing us that it is a true story... apart from the bits that aren't. It's been twisted a little to suit the comedy genre easier. What disappoints me is people's clear misinterpretation of the film's purpose. It is a comedy. It's not meant to be gory, despite focusing on two horrible criminals. It taking a light view on what is usually a grim subject. Don't expect blood and guts everywhere (though there are some, mostly in autopsy scenes.)

A fast pace and fun filled riot. Really. If you haven't laughed at death before, you will during this movie. Whether it's jamming men into barrels or unfortunate carriages, this movie makes death funny. How? A killer cast; that's how. With Pegg and Serkis as the foolish entrepreneurs, every death scene or attempted murder becomes ridiculously amusing, mainly down to the reactions of the pair. Also, prepare for lots of famous faces popping up for a small amount of time. Christopher Lee, Paul Whitehouse, Bill Bailey and more. Ronnie Corbett is also in for a 'small role.' (Gettit?) It's brilliantly funny. It's not just the front men or the cameos either. Tim Curry truly steals scenes as Dr. Monroe who finds feet fascinating and Jessica Hynes is absolutely brilliant and also contributes to the oddest, but also funniest, sex scenes I've ever seen.

Children Of Men 2: Andy Serkis is Simon Pegg's gynecologist

And it is brilliantly directed too. From chasing runaway barrels to shit-out-the-window gags, the comedy is perfectly timed. It's not just the comedy either. We can see that director John Landis can push the boundaries of genres. Despite all the comedy, Landis recognises the dark nature of the period and throws in a couple of moments to make you jump. In other technical areas there's nothing particularly special. The camera work is average and the score is generic. They don't add anything, which is a pity. But it's okay because it's bloody funny. (Another pun there. I'm on a roll!)

Certainly worth a watch. Not the best film I've seen recently but I would say (along with Scott Pilgrim) one of the funniest. Watch it.

Best bit? So many moments. But I'll say when a certain cameo reaches his demise in a carriage. I still laugh at the memory.